| Earth Summit >
News > This is the latest news story
Greenpeace to Capitals: Whose Side
Are You On?
New York, US, 5 April 2002:
As it becomes clear that the US is flagrantly ignoring the mandate
of the UN's Earth Summit, yet another exposé yesterday revealed
evidence of how the Bush government will stop at nothing to undermine
international agreements that might save the planet from wholesale
destruction.
As the Third
Session of the Preparatory Committee (Prepcom III) for the Johannesburg
Earth Summit grinds inconclusively to a halt, Greenpeace called
upon governments today to either stand up for people and the planet
to make the UN World Summit on Sustainable Development an action
plan for the future, or wear the blame along with the US for dismantling
more than three decades of international efforts to protect the
environment, enhance social justice, and ensure economic opportunities
for all.
"It's clear
that the US's game plan is to systematically undermine the rest
of the world's attempts to reach agreements of global significance.
We all know that environmental degradation, social inequity and
war do not respect national boundaries: Only agreements between
nations will give us any chance of holding back the tide,"
said Remi Parmentier, Political Director of Greenpeace International.
"We're
wondering, and you can bet a lot of other voters out there are as
well, just whose side their governments are on. Those governments
which are not sucked into the US vortex need to stand up and show
some leadership before it's too late for us and them," said
Parmentier.
It would appear
that under this new US vision the highest calling for government
is to run an efficient business park, and the Johannesburg Summit
may turn out to be nothing more than a glorified trade fair for
US and other multinational corporations, if the United States gets
its way.
The US, backed
primarily by Australia, has threatened to veto ANY meaningful political
agreements at Johannesburg, and is instead arguing in favor of purely
voluntary and unenforceable agreements with the private sector to
address the major global problems of poverty alleviation, environmental
destruction and economic development.
This is directly
in contravention of the UN General Assembly Resolution which convened
the Summit, with the specific goal of agreeing concrete action plans
with targets and timetables to implement Agenda 21, the wide-ranging
agreement on sustainable development agreed at the first Earth Summit
in Rio de Janeiro in 1992.
'We call on
governments to accept the responsibility for which they were elected,
and not let the US get away with this," said Parmentier, "Bush
does not have the moral authority to use the UN for his and his
oil cronies' ends."
Download
the latest ECO to see NGO's proposals for a way forward.
Media Contacts:
Remi Parmentier +31 6 53504702
Steve Sawyer +31 6 53504715
Susan Cavanagh +31 6 212 96910
Notes to
Editors:
For example
:
* The US has
actively sought to delete all references to the Kyoto Protocol in
the negotiating text, despite George Bush's promise to European
leaders last June, and reiterated this February, that the US would
not stand in the way of nations which wanted to proceed with the
Kyoto Protocol, the only international instrument to tackle climate
change.
* The US, along
with its allies in Australia, Canada, Japan, Saudi Arabia and Venezuela,
have actively opposed any concrete action to boost the renewable
energy industry; either to combat poverty or to fight climate change.
* Earlier this
week, it was revealed that the United States, at the urging of Exxon
Mobil Corporation, is seeking to undermine the scientific integrity
of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, seeking to oust
the current Chairman, American Bob Watson, because of highly informed
and widely supported views on the science of climate change. "Now
that the Bush Administration has failed in all its attempts to attack
climate science, it has now resorted to attacking the scientists,"
said Parmentier.
* Greenpeace
has learned today that the US plans, as part of their anti-environment
diplomatic offensive, to send EIGHTY "observers" to the
Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity,
which the US signed at the first Earth Summit in Rio in 1992, but
typically, now refuses to ratify. "This is an awful lot of
notetakers," said Parmentier, "almost one for every other
national delegation". Developing countries have expressed vehemently
their need to have control of the use of their genetic resources
to prevent the 'bio-piracy' currently practiced by US pharmaceutical
and biotechnology corporation, and ensure benefit sharing.
|