search news
press releases
background
act!
links
contact us! Please bear with us if we can't answer immediately
home

BIOSAFETY PROTOCOL PRESS ADVISORY

It is the view of Greenpeace that there should be no irreversible releases of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) into the environment given their possible adverse effects on biodiversity, taking also into account human health. There is already sufficient knowledge that releases of GMOs can have irreversible effects on ecosystems and that genetic pollution may lead to self-replicating, man-made damage to the environment. Current assessments of the potential adverse impacts of GMOs rarely consider the possible long-term effects on the environment and human health.

Montreal, 24 January 2000

BIOSAFETY PROTOCOL: THE TEN KEY ELEMENTS:

  • The precautionary principle must be the overriding objective and the basis for all decision-making under the Biosafety Protocol. Since there is no consensus amongst scientists about the environmental and health safety of releasing GMOs (known in these negotiations as Living Modified Organisms and products thereof), the Biosafety Protocol must support the need for countries to take preventative measures and action. Suggestions that there should be a list of living modified organisms excluded from the scope of the Protocol would be inconsistent with a precautionary approach, and therefore rejected;

  • The Biosafety Protocol must establish an international advance informed agreement for all living modified organisms and products thereof, including in particular transgenic commodities, prior to any transboundary movements. The Protocol must reaffirm the right of countries to ban shipments of living modified organisms and products thereof on the basis of concerns about potential adverse impacts to the environment, human health and socio-economic conditions;

  • Provisions for the establishment of an effective liability regime in respect of all activities within the scope of the Biosafety Protocol must be adopted. At this stage in the negotiations, there should be no backtracking on commitments to develop such rules within four years of entry into force;

  • The Biosafety Protocol must require labelling and traceability of living modified organisms and products thereof for biosafety purposes;

  • The Biosafety Protocol must provide a mechanism to ban and phase out at the global level any living modified organism that may have adverse impacts on the conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity, taking also into account risks to human health.

  • The Biosafety Protocol must prevent all imports and/or releases of living modified organisms or products thereof into centres of genetic diversity and centres of origin or environmentally sensitive areas;

  • The Biosafety Protocol must apply to products derived from living modified organisms;

  • The Biosafety Protocol and its advance informed agreement must apply to living modified organisms destined for contained use;

  • In order to reinforce the Biosafety Protocol and encourage membership, there should be no trade with non-Parties to the Protocol. Arrangements with non-Parties should be permitted only on terms that are more environmentally stringent than those set out in the Protocol;

  • The Biosafety Protocol will be the most comprehensive international legal instrument regulating the use of living modified organisms. Any suggestion of subordination to other international agreements, such as the rules of the World Trade Organisation, would be inconsistent with the aims and purpose of the Convention on Biological Diversity.


Greenpeace has prepared an annotated negotiating text for the Biosafety Protocol, available on request.

For further information, please contact the Greenpeace International delegation:
(514) 243 5709;
(514) 975 1774.

 

top / home