|
6.
GE products on the market
By
December 1998, the following genetically engineered products
had received approval in the US: herbicide-resistant canola
(oilseed rape), radicchio, maize, cotton, and soybeans; insect-resistant
maize, cotton and potatoes; virus-resistant papaya, potato
and squash; canola (oilseed rape) designed to produce high
concentrations of lauric acid; tomatoes engineered to delay
their ripening, or have thicker skins; a rabies vaccine; a
bacterium designed to enhance nitrogen fixation in the soil,
and a genetically engineered growth hormone (rBST/rBGH) designed
to boost milk production in dairy cows.(1)
Sixteen genetically
engineered crops had been granted marketing approval in the
EU by December 1998.(2) Of these, the only
ones to have received unanimous approval by all the member
states were two varieties of genetically engineered carnation:
one with 'improved vase life', and one with altered colouring.
All the other approvals have been disputed. Products officially
approved as 'safe' have subsequently been banned in certain
countries, while the introduction of many of the food crops
which have been approved are now subject to delays as a result
of concern about their impacts on health and the environment.
Besides the carnations
mentioned above, the crops granted EU approval include herbicide-resistant
tobacco, maize, chicory (allowed for breeding prupose only),
soybeans, and oilseed rape; and insect- resistant maize.(3)
The genetically engineered ingredients already in European
shops include soybeans and maize.
"Within five
years-and certainly within ten-some 90-95 per cent of plant-derived
food material in the United States will come from genetically
engineered techniques."
-Val
Giddings, Vice President for Food and Agriculture of the Biotechnology
Industry Organisation (4)
Most of the genetically
engineered crops already on the market have been designed
to be resistant to herbicides or insects. Over the next few
years, the industry plans to introduce more crops with 'quality
traits' perceived as benefits for consumers or the food processing
industry. An example of this is the attempt to engineer fruit
and vegetables that ripen more slowly, allowing them to be
transported over greater distances and kept for longer on
supermarket shelves without losing the appearance of being
fresh.(5)
Other kinds of
food on their way include the so-called 'functional foods'
and 'nutraceuticals', which claim to enhance health and wellbeing.
Examples include foods with added vitamins and altered nutritional
values, such as 'vitamin A rice',(hyperlink here to new section
on Golden Rice) or 'low-fat crisps' from potatoes that have
a higher starch content and less water, so can be fried in
less oil.(6)
References:
1.
Union of Concerned Scientists (June 2001) Foods allowed on
the market. <http://www.ucsusa.org/food/gen.market.html>
(as of November 2001).
2.
Most of these approvals have certain restrictions e.g. the
crops have been approved for import only, but not for planting,
crops approved for breeding purpose only etc.
3.
GeneWatch UK (1999) Genetic Engineering: A Review of Developments
in 1998. GeneWatch Briefing Number 5, p. 2
4.
Quoted by Kathy Koch in the 4 September 1998 issue of the
Congressional Quarterly Researcher.
5.
Evans D. (1996) Produce-on-demand: What's good for US markets
is good for world markets too. Nature Biotechnology Vol. 14,
p. 802.
6.
Marvin Hayenga (1998) Structural Change in the Biotech Seed
and Chemical Industrial Complex. AgBioForum, Vol. 1 No. 2
GeneWatch (1999)
Genetic Engineering: A Review of Developments in 1998. Briefing
Number 5, p. 6
RAFI (1999) The
Gene Giants: Masters of the Universe? Communiqué March/April
1999
next
I food
intro
|