[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Greenpeace Applies to Run Atlantic Frontier Oil Development
17TH LICENSING ROUND FINAL DAY:
GREENPEACE APPLIES TO RUN ATLANTIC FRONTIER OIL DEVELOPMENT
At a cost of stlg3,000 Greenpeace has applied for a license
to manage the area covered in the Government's 17th round
of oil development.
"Our plan is to do what the Government should do and set
aside these 22,000 square miles instead of drilling for
oil", said Greenpeace Deputy Executive Director Chris
Rose. "Our aim is to set a precedent where the Government
has failed to act".
Greenpeace has pointed out that, whereas it is Government
policy to limit fossil fuel, its energy policy is to
increase fossil fuel development.
The Greenpeace application requests that the organisation
be awarded the blocks as operator and guardian of the
area. Greenpeace will not exploit the area for oil
because of the insanity of allowing new fossil fuels to
contribute still further to human made climate change.
Rather, the area will be thoroughly investigated to produce a
better understanding of its marine life and ecosystem.
Quoting the President of the Board of Trade's (DTI) own
announcement on the 17th round, Greenpeace states, "We
hope that, as outlined in your official announcement, you
will judge our application `against the background of the
continuing need for expeditions...and with due regard to
environmental considerations'".
Greenpeace is arguing that the world does not `need' these
further oil expeditions and simply cannot afford them in
climate terms.
The EU has set a policy objective to keep global mean
temperature rise below 2 degrees Celsius above pre-
industrial levels. This temperature was defined by the
United Nations Environmental Programme as `an upper limit
beyond which the risks of grave damage to ecosystems and of
non-linear responses are expected to increase rapidly'. This
effectively sets a carbon budget on the world.
MORE/...
...Greenpeace applies to run Atlantic Frontier/2
Taking the EU's 2 degree limit and assuming that, in the
best case scenario, the climate is less sensitive to the
effects of CO2, the total carbon budget can be calculated
as 585 billion tonnes of carbon. This carbon budget
allows the world to burn only half the `recoverable'
reserves (those already identified). To meet safer eco
limits, even less can be burnt.
Speaking about the application, Chris Rose said, "Human
made climate change has to be stopped and meeting eco
limits means placing a limit on fossil fuels. Opening
22,000 sq. miles of pristine ocean for new oil
development is hardly a limiting exercise - it's madness fuelled
by greed".
Greenpeace has fulfilled all the requirements of the
application including providing a workplan which details
an in-depth scientific study of whale movement in the
area.
The organisation has today written to the President of the
DTI Ian Lang, outlining the justification and need for
taking a non interventionist approach to the management of
the Atlantic Frontier. The letter highlights the
importance of his decision in relation to government
commitments to the climate convention.
ends
Notes to correspondents:
1) Copy of the letter to Ian Lang and the Greenpeace
application available on request.
2) The licensing round also includes some area in the
North Sea and the South West of Britain.
3) Map of the Atlantic Frontier licensing area available
on request.
4) Carbon cycle models indicate that to keep world average
temperature rises below 1 degree Celsius over the next one
hundred years would require no more than 225 billion
tonnes of carbon to be released into the atmosphere - this
would allow stabilisation of carbon dioxide in the
atmosphere at 330 ppm. Pre-industrial levels of CO2 were about
280 ppm and present concentrations are 360 ppm. This budget
for fossil fuels assumes that their is no net contribution
to CO2 concentrations from deforestation.
For further information please contact the Greenpeace Press
Office on 0171-865 8255/6/7 or 0171-359 4837