
Factory Fishing & Flags of Convenience
Their
sheer size and sophisticated fishing technologies enable them to remain
at sea for months, to engage in unregulated fishing on the high seas, to
roam as far as the Southern Ocean to pirate fish, or to illegally poach
in the waters of other countries.
Behind the plague of unregulated and pirate fishing is the world’s industrialised
fishing fleet with vessels that can roam the world’s oceans and deplete
fish stocks at will, operating beyond nation-state regulation.
Their sheer size and sophisticated fishing technologies enable them to
remain at sea for months, to engage in unregulated fishing on the high
seas, to roam as far as the Southern Ocean to pirate fish, or to illegally
poach in the waters of other countries.
These industrial fishing ships are involved in exploratory fishing in
deep ocean areas, exploiting previously unfished species and ecosystems.
Industrialised fleets are also involved in conflicts with small-scale
fishers as they plunder the fish closer to shore, which coastal fishing
communities rely on for food and livelihoods.
Of the world’s fishing fleet of 3.5 million vessels, 99 per cent are
small-scale and non-industrialised; many are simple canoes powered by
paddles or sail.
By contrast, the high-tech industrialised fishing vessels, many exceeding
the length of a football field, are largely corporate-owned and dominate
the world’s fish trading business. They harvest luxury commodities for
wealthy markets.
The large-scale fleet is made up of some 35,000 vessels - a mere one
percent of the entire global fishing fleet by number - but these 35,000
vessels make up about half (50 per cent) of the world’s fishing capacity.
It’s little wonder, then, that the industrialized fishing fleet is a
glutton for fish, landing more than half of the world’s marine catch each
year.
The United Nations Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO) has established
a process involving up to 100 countries to produce an international Plan
of Action to combat IUU fishing.
In 1995, the FAO Ministerial Conference on Fisheries adopted the Rome
Consensus on World Fisheries. It described the problem of overfishing
and particularly the over-capacity of industrial fishing fleets as a threat
to the sustainability of the world’s fisheries resources for present and
future generations. The ministers urged governments and international
organisations to urgently review the capacity of fishing fleets and where
necessary reduce them.
This process was reinforced in April 1999 by the United Nations Convention
on Sustainable Development which called on the International Maritime
Organisation to develop legally binding measures to close the loophole
in international law which allows vessels to fish under flags of convenience.
On November 24, 1999, the United Nations General Assembly adopted Resolution
54/32 by consensus. In debating the threats to the world’s oceans, the
UN Secretary General and the General Assembly placed particular emphasis
on the need to eradicate illegal fishing, primarily by fishing vessels
flying Flags of Convenience.
The Resolution:
No 6. Calls upon all States to ensure that their vessels comply with
the conservation and management measures in accordance with the Agreement
that have been adopted by sub-regional and regional fisheries management
organisations and arrangements;
No 7. Calls upon States not to permit vessels flying their flag to engage
in fishing on the high seas without having effective control over their
activities and to take specific measures to control fishing operations
by vessels flying their flag.
Unfortunately, those nations that must act urgently are not putting words
into practice. According to research commissioned by Greenpeace, fishing
fleets are not being downsized: fishing capacity – the ability to catch
more and more fish—is in fact increasing.
There has been a significant increase in the fishing power of so- called
“flag of convenience” states such as Honduras, Panama, Cyprus, Liberia,
Belize, and others. More countries are offering their flags than ever
before.
While all countries can flag ocean-going vessels, some are notorious
as “flags of convenience” because their governments turn a blind eye to
international rules and regulations. By flagging new vessels or reflagging
older vessels to “flag of convenience” countries their owners conveniently
“dodge the rules” of international law.
Many of the pirate longliners that are plundering the Patagonian Toothfish
and slaughtering the albatross in the Southern Ocean are known to fly
flags of convenience.
Greenpeace demands:
Greenpeace calls on governments of fishing nations to cut the numbers
and capacity of large-scale fishing fleets by at least half by 2005 by:
- Eliminating governments subsidies to industrialised fishing vessels and
fleets Imposing a global moratorium on new industrialised fishing vessel
construction
- Establishing or enhancing fishing vessel decommissioning schemes
- Eliminating reflagging and flag of convenience (pirate/illegal) fishing
vessels
- Ratifying and implementing the 1995 UN Fisheries Agreement
- Adopting and applying the Greenpeace Principles for Ecologically Responsible
Fisheries, including the strict application of the Precautionary Approach
to fisheries management.
SEE MORE Greenpeace Resources
|