 |

Latest
Updates
Onboard
stories
April
21: Barbecuing on the High Seas
April
19:Beginners guide to nautical terms
April 12: The Garbologist and the art
of garbology
Meet
the Crew
Find out a little about the personalities onboard the MV Greenpeace and
send them a message.
Illustrated
Webcasts
Politics
Greenpeace
letters to Governments and recieved responses
|
 |
 |
 |
 |

Greenpeace
activists are on the high seas to stop the illegal plunder of fish stocks
by pirate fishing vessels. See below to get a feel of the actions aimed
at ending pirate fishing.
|
ACTION
UPDATE: CHEATING THE RULES: Greenpeace calls on all reefers not
to tranship from pirate fishing vessels.
Saturday, 13th May, 2000
|
 |
We continue
to follow the MV Hau Shen 202, the pirate fishing vessel registered on
Belize flag, which we prevented from transhipping its catch to the MV
Toyou yesterday. Again we are surrounded by fishing vessels - there are
five vessels on the radar (including the Hau Shen 202).
10:40:
Tweetie flies out to investigate, returning an hour later.
| 11:40:
Helene, George, Jeremy and I have a look at the footage which Gavin
shot of the vessels. There are two Taiwanese vessels, the Hau Shen
236 and the Yu I Hsiang 666. And two more pirates! Chen Fa 736 displays
no flag. I Man Hung 166 has EG Malabo written on the bow: (s)he's
flagged with Equatorial Guinea. |
 |
Equatorial
Guinea, although a Contracting Party to ICCAT, was sanctioned for bluefin
tuna at the 1999 meeting of ICCAT in Brazil, for failing to observe ICCAT
regulations, for example, failing to provide data about catches. This
means that there is an import ban on tuna from Equatorial Guinea into
other ICCAT Contracting Parties. Bluefin is the most valuable of the tuna
species: in recent years, the wholesale price paid at landing for top
sashimi-quality tuna has reached more than US$200 per kilogram, with some
of the largest, high-quality individual tuna fetching up to US$50,000
a piece.
Of the major
tuna stocks in the Atlantic, bluefin is without doubt in the worst condition.
The adult biomass of the eastern stock of bluefin is less than one fifth
of its 1970 level. Current catches are about twice what the stock can
sustain.
Scientists have warned that even under favourable conditions, reducing
catches to approximately half the current levels would only stop further
declines in the stock: more drastic cuts would be needed to allow rebuilding.
A ban on longlining for bluefin during the spawning season in the Mediterranean
has been a failure, with longliners flying Flags of Convenience, or no
flag at all, continuing to fish. The extent of fishing by FOC vessels,
not only for bluefin, but also bigeye and swordfish, means that even strict
conservation measures adopted and observed by ICCATs Contracting
Parties cannot be enough to allow stocks to rebuild if the pirates are
not controlled.
ICCAT has implemented some strong and potentially very effective measures
in an attempt to curb this fisheries piracy. In 1992 it adopted the first
of a series of resolutions to create the Bluefin Tuna Statistical Document
Programme with the aim of identifying bluefin which had hitherto gone
unreported by either the flag state or the vessel owners. Any bluefin
which is imported into a Contracting Party of ICCAT must be accompanied
by a document listing the exporting country, the weight of the fish, the
area of harvest and other details. Without such a document the tuna must
be refused. The importing country (usually Japan) sends a summary of these
import data to ICCAT, which can then compare these data to the declared
catches of tuna. Any country which exports bluefin to Japan but does not
declare the catches, or is not a member of ICCAT, is then viewed, in ICCAT
jargon, as fishing for bluefin tuna in a manner which diminishes
the effectiveness of the relevant conservation recommendations.
In other
words, those countries are cheating on the rules
| 16:15:
We have been tracking the Hau Shen 202 all day and now catch up with
her. The MV Greenpeace moves up to port and then starboard of this
Belize-flagged pirate fishing vessel to investigate. She seems to
lie very low in the water, which would indicate that she must have
a pretty full hold. However, not too full to continue fishing - she
is now hauling in her longline to starboard. |
 |
We can see
the crew working away on deck, reeling in the line and rolling up the
tracer lines (the shorter lines with hooks, attached to the main longline).
Clearly for them, Saturday is a working day, like any other.
 |
If
working conditions on board the Hau Shen 202, are as hard as for the
crew of the Chien Chun No. 8, they'll be working solidly 7 days a
week, having only one month off after a year at sea.
16:20: Tweetie lifts off from the heli deck with a banner in the
shape of a big yellow arrow, complete with the pirate flag of skull
and crossbones. It reads: "Pirates Here!" and points to
the Hau Shen 202, as Tweetie flies in front and behind her. And so
the Hau Shen 202 continues to fish in contravention of ICCAT and in
full knowledge of its provisions: we delivered a message to her yesterday,
(at the same time as we delivered the message to the reefer MV Toyou),
informing her that she was fishing in contravention of ICCAT and requesting
that she stop. |
Greenpeace
calls on all reefers to refuse to accept catch from the MV Hau Shen 202
and any other vessel fishing in contravention of ICCAT. Any reefer transhipping
tuna from vessels such as the Hau Shen 202, does so in contravention of
the provisions of ICCAT. This means that they will undermine conservation
measures and contribute to continued overfishing of already seriously
depleted stocks of bluefin and bigeye tunas and swordfish in Atlantic
and Mediterranean waters.
Can pirate fishing be said to be in any one's interest? The companies
that own the fishing vessels, whether pirate or legal? When the last tuna
is fished, what will these ships and companies do then? The crews of the
pirate fishing vessels? They may be earning a relatively good wage now,
comparative to average income in the countries from which they come, but
they are nevertheless invariably being exploited by the companies which
hire them. And if the crews are being paid for the fish they catch, then
the "good times" will be short- lived: wages will decline. When
the last fish is fished, where then will the crews turn for their living
- ultimately their jobs will disappear along with the tuna.
Other fishermen? The pirates are stealing the fish that legal fishermen
are entitled to catch. And what of the livelihoods of local fishermen,
and peoples along the coastal states of West Africa?
Lovers of seafood? It takes only an elementary knowledge of economics
to understand that demand is already exceeding supply, forcing prices
up. This leads to a vicious circle where fish, such as the bluefin tuna
become so valuable that companies are willing to break any and every regulation
to hunt down the last fish. For fish lovers, fish will increasingly become
a luxury for the rich.
|