World Bank Fact Sheet #4
THE WORLD BANK, CHEMICAL GIANTS AND THE OZONE LAYER
The World Bank controls the money for the Montreal Protocol on Substances
that Deplete the Ozone Layer, which is supposed to help developing
countries switch to ozone-friendly alternatives. However, the Bank has
turned this into a profit engine for
chemical companies. While many countries are switching to safer and
cheaper alternatives, the Bank drags its feet and overwhelmingly supports
the transnational chemical companies.
The British Antarctic Survey states that if ozone continues to disappear
over the Antarctic at the same rate as it is now, there will be none left
in October 2005. While production of CFCs has been curtailed, the levels
of CFCs in the upper atmosphere are
still increasing, so things will get worse before the effect of the current
cuts are felt.
Alternatives exist. Greenpeace, along with an East German company,
developed a domestic refrigerator which runs on butane as a coolant and
cyclopentane in the insulation foam. The "Greenfreeze" has now been taken
up by major manufacturers Bosch-Siemens, Liebherr, Electrolux, and
Matsushita. The World Bank has approved this technology as a viable
alternative, yet out of 176 projects only one takes this route. Instead,
the Bank prefers to fund projects using the ozone-destroying HCFCs and
global warming HFCs put up by chemical giants like ICI, Du Pont and
Atochem.
The World Bank And Ozone Depletion By Numbers
- Total developing country use of ozone depleting substances (1991)-
150,000 tonnes a year
- Percentage increase in developing country use of ozone depleting
substances (1986-1991) - 54%
- Total funds allocated to date for the Montreal Protocol
implementing agencies - US$152.1 million
- Amount of Montreal Protocol funds allocated to the World Bank-
US$92.2 million
- Number of projects administered by the Bank - 176
- Percentage of Montreal Protocol funds administered by the Bank- 60.6%
- Percentage of funds allocated to the Bank that have been disbursed
- 6.2%
- Total tons of Ozone Destroying Substances (ODS) phased out to date - 951
- Tons of ODS phased out to date by the Bank - 245
- Tons of ODS to be phased out by Bank projects approved to date: 21,434
- Percentage of Bank's approved ODS phase-out that has actually been
phased out - 0.011%
- Percentage of Bank's phase-out to date accomplished by using
"reduced CFC" technology - 81%
- Percentage of all agency project funding slated for HCFCs and HFCs
- at least 60%
- Funds allocated to Bank for refrigeration and foam sector projects
- US$48.3 million
- Refrigeration and foam projects, as percentage of total Bank
Montreal Protocol projects - 52%
- Percentage of Bank refrigeration and foam sector projects that fund
chemical company alternatives - 94.4%
- Number of Bank projects that use "greenfreeze" technology - 1
- Number of Ozone Operations Resource Group (OORG: the Bank's
technical advisory body) sector chairs: 7
- Percentage of OORG sector chairs with strong ties to chemical
companies: 100
- Number of OORG sector chairs now employed by ICI - 2
Greenpeace Demands
- The World bank must immediately stop funding 50%-reduced-CFC, HCFC
and HFCs projects.
- The World Bank must immediately expedite the process of funds
disbursement to developing countries.
- The World Bank should balance its expertise in the Ozone
Operations Resource Group (OORG) with experts in not-in-kind technologies.
Return to the Greenpeace Ozone Homepage, or
Return to the Greenpeace International Home
Page.