Greenpeace
recommendations to the conference
|

Imported plastics recycling/sorting facility, Jakarta, Indonesia.
© Greenpeace
|
The WTO must stop promoting free trade at all costs.
Trade must not be considered as a goal in itself; instead
it should be considered and developed only as a tool to meet
the international community's commitment to achieve sustainable
development - a pre-condition to the maintenance of any sustainable
economy.
With this in mind, Greenpeace International believes that
the following key proposals would represent decisive steps
towards Safe Trade.
|
We are calling upon WTO members to give full consideration to the
following proposals, and to endorse them in Doha at the 4th Ministerial
Conference of the WTO.
Kyoto Protocol/WTO linkage
WTO member states must seize the opportunity of the WTO Ministerial
Conference to increase pressure on the United States with regard
to their rejection of the Kyoto Protocol on Climate Change. WTO
member states should say before arriving in Doha that they will
not discuss the possibility of a new round of trade liberalisation
if the US does not agree to ratify the Kyoto Protocol.
If the US continues to refuse to ratify the Kyoto Protocol, WTO
Member States who support Kyoto should also consider bringing that
country before a WTO Dispute Settlement Panel, because the US position
is providing the equivalent of a hidden subsidy for their domestic
industry, inconsistent with WTO rules.
Assessment
As an initial step, the ability to ensure that trade rules are sustainable
depends on the availability of accurate knowledge of the impacts
of such rules. Comprehensive environmental and social impact assessments
are thus essential to resolving the issues raised. This assessment
process is long overdue. It must begin immediately.
It must be open and transparent, global in scope, and conducted
through a balanced and impartial process. It should be carried out
in co-operation with all trading partners, and with the rest of
the UN family (i.e. UNEP, UNDP, FAO, UNESCO, MEAs, etc) and take
account of the expertise of NGOs. A retrospective and honest review
of past and current impacts of existing policy must complement a
forward-looking reform.
The fundamental question is whether the framework of laws, policies
and institutions is in place to ensure that additional multilateral
steps to liberalise trade will lead to environmentally and socially
beneficial outcomes. If not, then the assessment must formulate
needed institutional, legal and policy changes.
"Decisions taken by our institution affect the lives of
ordinary men and women all over the world. It is right that we should
be held accountable," WTO Director-General Mike Moore
|
Rule changes
Even before complete assessments are conducted, it is clear
that certain changes to the WTO rules and policies are urgently
required.
These changes include:
a) All WTO members must recognise that multilateral environmental
agreements (MEAs) cannot be superseded by the WTO. WTO rules
and decisions must support and not interfere with the objectives
and effectiveness of MEAs;
"We need to recognise the gaps in the international
architecture," WTO Director-General Mike Moore.
|

Loggs and sawnwood from the flooded forests
waiting for export, Santarem port, Brazil. © Greenpeace
|
b) The WTO must incorporate the precautionary principle in its
decision-making as the most scientifically rigorous approach. This
must include a shift of the burden of proof in dispute settlement
proceedings as an integral part of the precautionary principle;
"None of us has perfect knowledge," WTO Director-General
Mike Moore.
c) In line with GATT Article XX and other relevant provisions, the
WTO must accept the value of trade-restricting measures under clearly
defined conditions that respect equity and other concerns of developing
countries. National trade-related measures aimed at protecting the
environment can be useful for managing domestic consumption, and
catalysing international action in cases where there are no appropriate
binding international environmental standards.
"Voters and consumers want more information and control,
accountability and greater ownership," WTO Director-General
Mike Moore.
d) Distinctions between products that are based upon production
or processing methods (PPMs) related to the environment should be
accepted by the WTO. Such PPM-based distinctions can be applied
as part of international agreements, as well as through appropriate
national measures (e.g. eco-labelling and other labelling schemes
aiming at informing the public on the hazards of certain goods);
"I know trade alone is not the answer," WTO Director-General
Mike Moore.
e) As a matter of principle, there should be no patents on life
forms. The Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property
Rights (TRIPS), which constitutes a grave trade/environment conflict
involving the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) urgently
needs a solution. Harmonisation of Article 27.3(b) of the TRIPS
agreement with the provisions of the CBD and the FAO International
Undertaking is needed to guarantee the conservation and sustainable
use of biological diversity, the protection of the rights and knowledge
of indigenous and local communities, as well as the promotion of
farmers´ rights.
"Heavy, fresh and creative thinking must be done about the
roles, functions, jurisdictions, obligations, management and mandates
of all international institutions and how to deliver our services,"
WTO Director-General Mike Moore.
f) Transparency, openness and consultation at the WTO urgently need
to be improved, including the establishment of rules providing NGOs
as well as indigenous and local communities with the right to be
truly consulted in dispute settlement procedures, and to attend
WTO negotiations. The fact that, in 2001, NGOs remain excluded from
the meetings of the WTO Committee on Trade and the Environment and
the Committee on Trade and Development is an anachronism. NGO participation
would be mutually beneficial, and is likely to lead to improved
mutual understanding;
"I welcome scrutiny, it makes us stronger and more accountable,"
WTO Director-General Mike Moore.
g) There should be more coherence in the subsidy reduction/elimination
policy of the WTO's Agreement on Subsidies, taking into account
environmental, social and development aspects. Environmentally damaging
subsidies, e.g. in agriculture, forestry and fisheries, should be
eliminated. Most importantly these subsidies put environmentally
benign alternatives (such as clean production industries or practices
of artisan fisherfolk) at a disadvantage.
"Kofi Annan wants $10 billion to fight Aids; that is just
12 days of subsidies in
dollar terms," WTO Director-General Mike Moore.
No New Round - Limit the expansion of the WTO
Greenpeace International urges WTO member states to give priority
in Doha to the above recommendations, instead of launching a new
round of trade liberalisation. Endorsement of these recommendations
as the Doha agenda would constitute an excellent and concrete outcome
for the 4th ministerial conference of the WTO. The issues and outstanding
problems identified in this booklet demonstrate that it would be
irresponsible to embark in a new round while they have not been
resolved. Until the assessments and reforms listed above have been
completed, further economic liberalisation should continue to be
placed on hold. Now is the wrong time to expand the reach of the
WTO into new areas.
"Critics, who are not all mad or bad, frequently say that we
have too much power," WTO Director-General Mike Moore.
Is
Greening Doha possible?
Want more information? Download
the Safe Trade in the 21st Century report (Pdf - 559k)
|
|
|